Home / Chassis comparison / FAW Tiger V vs HINO 300

FAW Tiger VVSHINO 300

We compare two chassis for installing a COND van: payload, engine and key specs. The data is from our price list and vehicle cards; the configuration can be clarified on request.

	FAW Tiger V	HINO 300
Brand country	China	Japan
Payload	2,040 kg	3,500 kg
Gross weight	—	—
Engine	diesel Weichai 2.3 L, Euro-5	turbodiesel 4.0 L, 165 hp
Power	110 hp	165 hp
Torque	280 N·m	—
Gearbox	5-speed MT	—
Fuel tank	100 L	—
Wheelbase	—	—
Cab	—	—
Licence category	C	C
Chassis warranty	2 years	—
COND body up to (length)	4,200 mm	5,200 mm

The best value is marked in green. '—' — clarified on request.

⚠ The information on the page is for reference only and is not a public offer: specs and availability depend on the configuration and batch of a specific vehicle. Check the chassis price with official dealers and the van price with a COND manager.

Key differences

An overview of each chassis's main advantages — based on the table above.

Reasons to choose FAW Tiger V

+Clarify the task with a manager — we'll select by route and cargo

Reasons to choose HINO 300

+Carries 72% more cargo — 3 500 vs 2 040 kg
+More powerful engine by 50% — 165 vs 110 hp
+Longer COND body — up to 5,200 mm vs 4,200 mm

COND bodies on these chassis

Isothermal box Refrigerated van Dry freight box body Flatbed platform Drop-side with tilt

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper — FAW Tiger V or HINO 300?

Check the chassis price with official dealers. A manager will quote the price of a turnkey vehicle with a COND van on request — it depends on the body size, configuration and body type.

What body can be fitted on FAW Tiger V and HINO 300?

On both chassis COND installs an insulated van, a refrigerator, a dry-freight van, a flatbed platform and a curtain-side. The body is designed for the specific chassis with the factory warranty preserved.

What to choose for transporting food?

For food with a temperature mode, body volume and payload matter: a cheaper option suits light urban distribution, and a higher-payload chassis suits long-haul volumes. A COND manager will select the chassis and body for your route — leave a request.

Other comparisons

FAW 1027 (T80) vs FAW Tiger V FAW 1027 (T80) vs HINO 300 JAC N35 vs FAW Tiger V JAC N35 vs HINO 300 KIA Bongo K2500 vs FAW Tiger V KIA Bongo K2500 vs HINO 300 KIA Bongo K4000 vs FAW Tiger V KIA Bongo K4000 vs HINO 300 Hyundai Porter (H100) vs FAW Tiger V Hyundai Porter (H100) vs HINO 300 GAZelle Next (A21R33) vs FAW Tiger V GAZelle Next (A21R33) vs HINO 300 GAZelle Business (330202) vs FAW Tiger V GAZelle Business (330202) vs HINO 300 FAW Tiger V vs JAC N56 FAW Tiger V vs JAC N90 FAW Tiger V vs JAC N120 FAW Tiger V vs HINO 500 GD (8 т)JAC N56 vs HINO 300 JAC N90 vs HINO 300 JAC N120 vs HINO 300 HINO 300 vs HINO 500 GD (8 т)

Select a chassis and body →