Home / Chassis comparison / JAC N35 vs FAW Tiger V
We compare two chassis for installing a COND van: payload, engine and key specs. The data is from our price list and vehicle cards; the configuration can be clarified on request.
| JAC N35 | FAW Tiger V | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand country | China | China |
| Payload | 1,500 kg | 2,040 kg |
| Gross weight | 3,500 kg | — |
| Engine | petrol 2.0 L (X200), Euro-5 | diesel Weichai 2.3 L, Euro-5 |
| Power | — | 110 hp |
| Torque | — | 280 N·m |
| Gearbox | — | 5-speed MT |
| Fuel tank | — | 100 L |
| Wheelbase | — | — |
| Cab | 3-seat | — |
| Licence category | B | C |
| Chassis warranty | — | 2 years |
| COND body up to (length) | 3,200 mm | 4,200 mm |
The best value is marked in green. '—' — clarified on request.
⚠ The information on the page is for reference only and is not a public offer: specs and availability depend on the configuration and batch of a specific vehicle. Check the chassis price with official dealers and the van price with a COND manager.
An overview of each chassis's main advantages — based on the table above.
Isothermal boxRefrigerated vanDry freight box bodyFlatbed platformDrop-side with tilt
FAW 1027 (T80) vs JAC N35FAW 1027 (T80) vs FAW Tiger VJAC N35 vs KIA Bongo K2500JAC N35 vs KIA Bongo K4000JAC N35 vs Hyundai Porter (H100)JAC N35 vs GAZelle Next (A21R33)JAC N35 vs GAZelle Business (330202)JAC N35 vs JAC N56JAC N35 vs JAC N90JAC N35 vs JAC N120JAC N35 vs HINO 300JAC N35 vs HINO 500 GD (8 т)KIA Bongo K2500 vs FAW Tiger VKIA Bongo K4000 vs FAW Tiger VHyundai Porter (H100) vs FAW Tiger VGAZelle Next (A21R33) vs FAW Tiger VGAZelle Business (330202) vs FAW Tiger VFAW Tiger V vs JAC N56FAW Tiger V vs JAC N90FAW Tiger V vs JAC N120FAW Tiger V vs HINO 300FAW Tiger V vs HINO 500 GD (8 т)