Home / Chassis comparison / FAW Tiger V vs JAC N90
We compare two chassis for installing a COND van: payload, engine and key specs. The data is from our price list and vehicle cards; the configuration can be clarified on request.
| FAW Tiger V | JAC N90 | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand country | China | China |
| Payload | 2,040 kg | 4,300 kg |
| Gross weight | — | 9,030 kg |
| Engine | diesel Weichai 2.3 L, Euro-5 | diesel Cummins ISF3.8, Euro-5 |
| Power | 110 hp | 152 hp |
| Torque | 280 N·m | 491 N·m |
| Gearbox | 5-speed MT | 6-speed MT |
| Fuel tank | 100 L | 210 L |
| Wheelbase | — | 3,845 mm |
| Cab | — | — |
| Licence category | C | C |
| Chassis warranty | 2 years | 3 years / 200,000 km |
| COND body up to (length) | 4,200 mm | 6,200 mm |
The best value is marked in green. '—' — clarified on request.
⚠ The information on the page is for reference only and is not a public offer: specs and availability depend on the configuration and batch of a specific vehicle. Check the chassis price with official dealers and the van price with a COND manager.
An overview of each chassis's main advantages — based on the table above.
Isothermal boxRefrigerated vanDry freight box bodyFlatbed platformDrop-side with tilt
FAW 1027 (T80) vs FAW Tiger VFAW 1027 (T80) vs JAC N90JAC N35 vs FAW Tiger VJAC N35 vs JAC N90KIA Bongo K2500 vs FAW Tiger VKIA Bongo K2500 vs JAC N90KIA Bongo K4000 vs FAW Tiger VKIA Bongo K4000 vs JAC N90Hyundai Porter (H100) vs FAW Tiger VHyundai Porter (H100) vs JAC N90GAZelle Next (A21R33) vs FAW Tiger VGAZelle Next (A21R33) vs JAC N90GAZelle Business (330202) vs FAW Tiger VGAZelle Business (330202) vs JAC N90FAW Tiger V vs JAC N56FAW Tiger V vs JAC N120FAW Tiger V vs HINO 300FAW Tiger V vs HINO 500 GD (8 т)JAC N56 vs JAC N90JAC N90 vs JAC N120JAC N90 vs HINO 300JAC N90 vs HINO 500 GD (8 т)