Home / Chassis comparison / KIA Bongo K4000 vs FAW Tiger V
We compare two chassis for installing a COND van: payload, engine and key specs. The data is from our price list and vehicle cards; the configuration can be clarified on request.
| KIA Bongo K4000 | FAW Tiger V | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand country | Korea | China |
| Payload | 2,000 kg | 2,040 kg |
| Gross weight | — | — |
| Engine | gas-petrol Bi-Fuel (LPI) 2.4 L, Euro-5 | diesel Weichai 2.3 L, Euro-5 |
| Power | 159 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque | 226 N·m | 280 N·m |
| Gearbox | 5-speed MT | 5-speed MT |
| Fuel tank | 71 L gas + 65 L petrol | 100 L |
| Wheelbase | — | — |
| Cab | — | — |
| Licence category | B | C |
| Chassis warranty | 3 years / 150,000 km | 2 years |
| COND body up to (length) | 4,200 mm | 4,200 mm |
The best value is marked in green. '—' — clarified on request.
⚠ The information on the page is for reference only and is not a public offer: specs and availability depend on the configuration and batch of a specific vehicle. Check the chassis price with official dealers and the van price with a COND manager.
An overview of each chassis's main advantages — based on the table above.
Isothermal boxRefrigerated vanDry freight box bodyFlatbed platformDrop-side with tilt
FAW 1027 (T80) vs KIA Bongo K4000FAW 1027 (T80) vs FAW Tiger VJAC N35 vs KIA Bongo K4000JAC N35 vs FAW Tiger VKIA Bongo K2500 vs KIA Bongo K4000KIA Bongo K2500 vs FAW Tiger VKIA Bongo K4000 vs Hyundai Porter (H100)KIA Bongo K4000 vs GAZelle Next (A21R33)KIA Bongo K4000 vs GAZelle Business (330202)KIA Bongo K4000 vs JAC N56KIA Bongo K4000 vs JAC N90KIA Bongo K4000 vs JAC N120KIA Bongo K4000 vs HINO 300KIA Bongo K4000 vs HINO 500 GD (8 т)Hyundai Porter (H100) vs FAW Tiger VGAZelle Next (A21R33) vs FAW Tiger VGAZelle Business (330202) vs FAW Tiger VFAW Tiger V vs JAC N56FAW Tiger V vs JAC N90FAW Tiger V vs JAC N120FAW Tiger V vs HINO 300FAW Tiger V vs HINO 500 GD (8 т)